From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1a9916933cd3f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-15 13:08:24 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Next public release of GNAT(?) Date: 15 Jan 2002 13:08:23 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0201151308.2ee5b08f@posting.google.com> References: <3c3c0ca8$0$3190$626a54ce@news.free.fr> <874rlv8gmt.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <5ee5b646.0201091756.52f0a35a@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1011128904 22323 127.0.0.1 (15 Jan 2002 21:08:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Jan 2002 21:08:24 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18947 Date: 2002-01-15T21:08:24+00:00 List-Id: pontius@btv.MBI.com.invalid (Dale Pontius) wrote in message news:... > Pardon me if this is an old story, but what happened to > GNAT 4.0? > I presume you have some rationale for skipping to 5.0, > could you share? Yes, an old story indeed, early on we used 4.0 as a designation for the officially validated version, and did not want to cause confusion by reusing this designation for something else.