From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1a9916933cd3f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-14 19:55:38 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Next public release of GNAT(?) Date: 14 Jan 2002 19:55:38 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0201141955.3a4fe6a6@posting.google.com> References: <5ee5b646.0201091803.70a8129@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1011066938 29528 127.0.0.1 (15 Jan 2002 03:55:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Jan 2002 03:55:38 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18924 Date: 2002-01-15T03:55:38+00:00 List-Id: "Frank" wrote in message news:... > How many error reports do ACT get from users of the > public release? A few, mostly from a small group that sends reports > Do you usually get reports on problems that are already > detected by paying customers? Sometimes, not often > Do you get many reports, from users of the public > release, that are invalid Yes, quite often, we ignore them > alltogether(hence waste of your time)? They don't waste our time, because we simply ignore them As time goes by, it will be more appropriate to report errors using the standard gcc reporting mehanisms anyway.