From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1a9916933cd3f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-09 17:49:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Next public release of GNAT(?) Date: 9 Jan 2002 17:49:57 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0201091749.474481be@posting.google.com> References: <3c3c0ca8$0$3190$626a54ce@news.free.fr> <3c3c7eba$0$3190$626a54ce@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1010627397 376 127.0.0.1 (10 Jan 2002 01:49:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Jan 2002 01:49:57 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18721 Date: 2002-01-10T01:49:57+00:00 List-Id: Jean-Marc Bourguet wrote in message news:<3c3c7eba$0$3190$626a54ce@news.free.fr>... > The gcc team obviously (but I don't think that gcc team > will release the ada part without an agrement of Robert > Dewar It's not just me, several people share the role of fsf maintainer of GNAT. > and from what I get the status about ada in 3.1 is "will > be present if it is in a acceptable state Right, so the question is what is acceptable, and we are discussing that