From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1a9916933cd3f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-09 17:47:40 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Next public release of GNAT(?) Date: 9 Jan 2002 17:47:39 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0201091747.32b2aaca@posting.google.com> References: <3c3c0ca8$0$3190$626a54ce@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1010627260 322 127.0.0.1 (10 Jan 2002 01:47:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Jan 2002 01:47:40 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18720 Date: 2002-01-10T01:47:40+00:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake wrote in message news:... > No, the whole point of the gcc tree is that it is at gcc > 3.0, and the > Ada code builds on that. True, although you really mean 3.x at this stage > This will be the basis of the ACT 3.15 release. Please be VERY careful about making such statements on behalf of ACT, we prefer if people avoid spreading false information about our plans, because it confuses people. In fact this is completely wrong. 3.15 will still be based on 2.8.1, because the 3.x version of GNAT is definitely not stable yet (we are still failing dozens of our fixed test suite -- not so bad in a suite of over 7000 tests, but certainly not up to our QA standards.