From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1a9916933cd3f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-09 17:42:26 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Next public release of GNAT(?) Date: 9 Jan 2002 17:42:25 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0201091742.8374ea2@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1010626946 32671 127.0.0.1 (10 Jan 2002 01:42:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Jan 2002 01:42:26 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18718 Date: 2002-01-10T01:42:26+00:00 List-Id: Gerhard H�ring wrote in message news:... > Frank wrote in : > > Hi! > > > > Is there any forecast on when(if?) the public/free GNAT 3-14 for Linux > > becomes available? > > Yes, it will be the day after I managed to build GNAT from the gcc > source tree. > > Gerhard Well as usual, the amount of misinformation propagated on CLA is large, threatening in this thread to outweigh the valid information :-) No, the gcc source tree definitely does NOT correspond to GNAT 3.14.