From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a414836333dfef7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-04 16:40:42 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Elaboration in GNAT
Date: 4 Jan 2002 16:40:41 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0201041640.71e8c7c5@posting.google.com>
References: <1006952193.650930@edh3>
 <5ee5b646.0111281125.7e9fbca3@posting.google.com> <1010151875.216658@edh3>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1010191241 3787 127.0.0.1 (5 Jan 2002 00:40:41
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Jan 2002 00:40:41 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18571
Date: 2002-01-05T00:40:41+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Frode Tenneboe <ft@edh.ericsson.se> wrote in message news:<1010151875.216658@edh3>...
> However, I find the above warning a bit misplaced in my
> case. I would have preferred:
> 
> bar.adb:69:04: warning: instantiation of "Client" may raise Program_Error
> bar.adb:69:04: warning: missing pragma Elaborate_Body in spec


Well perhaps you would have preferred that the compiler
tell you this, but it won't because it is wrong! The use
of a EB pragma in the spec is not an adequate solution
for this case!

> I'm also unsure if this is always true, but > 
> alternatively:

It is not always true

> foo.adb:69:04: warning: instantiation of "Client" may raise Program_Error
> foo.adb:69:04: warning: missing pragma Elaborate_All for "bar" or
> foo.adb:69:04: warning:  missing pragma Elaborate_Body in "bar"


This is getting two separate things mixed up I am afraid.