From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,13b7917466f2d19
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-08 04:35:11 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.0
Date: 8 Dec 2001 04:35:11 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0112080435.3b11ac7@posting.google.com>
References: <9a575af3.0110020747.2304ce86@posting.google.com>
 <m3669o0y2u.fsf@yakisoba.forte-inOrganization: LJK Software
 <TcK5AtkXbXj1@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <m37ks1crl3.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com> <3C0E933F.86CA2FB8@usa.com>
 <m3ofldb58t.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>
 <5ee5b646.0112052127.421f6d4@posting.google.com>
 <87vgfjerf3.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <uoflbum5a.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
 <87snam210j.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
 <5ee5b646.0112072025.53182fb2@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1007814911 1240 127.0.0.1 (8 Dec 2001 12:35:11
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Dec 2001 12:35:11 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17626
Date: 2001-12-08T12:35:11+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote in message news:<5ee5b646.0112072025.53182fb2@posting.google.com>...
> Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote in message news:<87snam210j.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>...
> > I'm a bit puzzled because he mentioned a change to the 
> > sources on 2001-11-07 which hasn't made it yet to the 
> > official tree.

Florian sent me a note identifying the change, and it is
an area where we have not quite decided the best way to
handle things in the gcc tree, so it is a known discrepancy
(it relates to the labeling of versions, i.e. FSF version
versus GNAT Pro version, and so is a natural point of
divergence between the two trees, but we would like to have
a method of keeping the trees identical, and that is what
we are working on. Another issue is what should be in the
bug reporting box on the various versions.