From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6b7062ec13fd16a9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-04 19:31:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Abort of C-code in a asynchronous_select Date: 4 Dec 2001 19:31:28 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0112041931.397ac176@posting.google.com> References: <3C0CD717.F720A1DB@meppen.sema.slb.com> <3C0CE8F1.31F74C6@canal-plus.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1007523089 25860 127.0.0.1 (5 Dec 2001 03:31:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Dec 2001 03:31:29 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17426 Date: 2001-12-05T03:31:29+00:00 List-Id: Thierry Lelegard wrote in message news:<3C0CE8F1.31F74C6@canal-plus.fr>... > As a programming rule, we have banned ATC in our > developement teams. Full stop. Good idea :-) Note that you can enforce this with pragma Restrictions, and if you also enforce avoiding the use of abort, you may well find your runtime can behave more efficiently!