From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a414836333dfef7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-28 19:44:50 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Elaboration in GNAT
Date: 28 Nov 2001 19:44:50 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0111281944.22e7cae4@posting.google.com>
References: <1006952193.650930@edh3> <3C052930.4FE65C5D@Raytheon.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1007005490 19772 127.0.0.1 (29 Nov 2001 03:44:50
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Nov 2001 03:44:50 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17147
Date: 2001-11-29T03:44:50+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Mark Johnson <Mark_H_Johnson@Raytheon.com> wrote in message news:<3C052930.4FE65C5D@Raytheon.com>...
> Robert of course may give you slightly different 
> suggestions. One that I tend
> to ignore is to not use "gnatwa", but to specify exactly 
> which warnings you
> want and don't want. I have found over the last several 
> months that added
> warnings from gnatwa are beneficial and I'm sticking with 
> it.
> 
>   --Mark


That's fine, but you have to be prepared for new warnings
to pop up without warning, since we often add new warnings!