From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a414836333dfef7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-28 11:25:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Elaboration in GNAT Date: 28 Nov 2001 11:25:06 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0111281125.7e9fbca3@posting.google.com> References: <1006952193.650930@edh3> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1006975507 11244 127.0.0.1 (28 Nov 2001 19:25:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Nov 2001 19:25:07 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17129 Date: 2001-11-28T19:25:07+00:00 List-Id: Frode Tenneboe wrote in message news:<1006952193.650930@edh3>... > Using -gnatwa I get some elaboration issues with some legacy code in GNAT. > One of these are: > > foo.adb:69:04: warning: instantiation of "Client" may raise Program_Error > foo.adb:69:04: warning: missing pragma Elaborate_All for "bar" > Is there a way of getting the information above a bit > more verbose? If this message is not intelligible, I recommend reading the entire chapter on elaboration issues in the users guide. Elaboration is certainly a tricky issue, and generally you should not turn on -gnatwl unless you know what you are doing. We certainly find that helping customers work through elaboration issues is a significant part of our support effort, which is why we implemented the static model of elaboration to try to ameliorate this in the future.