From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e3cd8a6b7c1d008
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-26 20:04:08 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Error with:   for EntryName use at 16#address#;
Date: 26 Nov 2001 20:04:08 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0111262004.76d99b27@posting.google.com>
References: <SwYL7.8837$qw1.2054447@weber.videotron.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1006833848 5864 127.0.0.1 (27 Nov 2001 04:04:08
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Nov 2001 04:04:08 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17020
Date: 2001-11-27T04:04:08+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Jean-David Tr?anier" <JDT@hy.cgocable.ca> wrote in message news:<SwYL7.8837$qw1.2054447@weber.videotron.net>...
>          for Keyp use at 16#20#;       -- Error at this 
>                                                   line

Generally this kind of question is best addressed to your
compiler vendor, since this kind of issue is quite compiler
dependent. However, it seems worth pointing out that any
compiler that follows implementation advice (RM 13.7)


37   Address should be of a private type.

will of course reject this declaration. It is surprising
if any Ada 95 compiler does NOT follow this (very good)
implementation advice.