From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38ceb882eed41e1e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-30 18:02:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Size and pack Date: 30 Oct 2001 18:02:01 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0110301802.637c9b77@posting.google.com> References: <_umC7.74983$gT6.38373531@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1004493721 11840 127.0.0.1 (31 Oct 2001 02:02:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Oct 2001 02:02:01 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15456 Date: 2001-10-31T02:02:01+00:00 List-Id: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) wrote in message news:... > That would seem to indicate that depending on the VMS fixups would not > be allowed with pragma Atomic either. That would be fine if the fixup routine runs in a non-preemptible manner. There is no requirement that Atomic generate a single instruction (a conforming implementation could even take an OS lock to implement Atomic, though this is certainly not an intended implementation approach).