From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38ceb882eed41e1e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-30 17:57:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Size and pack Date: 30 Oct 2001 17:57:11 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0110301757.2ff09068@posting.google.com> References: <8b7C7.72629$gT6.36974049@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1004493432 11733 127.0.0.1 (31 Oct 2001 01:57:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Oct 2001 01:57:12 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15453 Date: 2001-10-31T01:57:12+00:00 List-Id: "Smark" wrote in message news:... > The problem was that this rep clause will not work, > because Log_Num must > be aligned to a 4-byte boundary. This is simply wrong. > Some compilers will silently ignore your > rep clause, I believe GNAT will tell you it can't do it. Belief is not a good substitute for knowledge :-) This is also wrong