From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38ceb882eed41e1e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-30 17:50:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Size and pack Date: 30 Oct 2001 17:50:14 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0110301750.38ba5bfd@posting.google.com> References: <9ff447f2.0110100005.2503bb00@posting.google.com> <3BC40DF2.9447F025@icn.siemens.de> <3bc41989.4285341@news.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1004493014 11643 127.0.0.1 (31 Oct 2001 01:50:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Oct 2001 01:50:14 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15450 Date: 2001-10-31T01:50:14+00:00 List-Id: john.mccabe@emrad.com.nospam (John McCabe) wrote in message news:<3bc41989.4285341@news.demon.co.uk>... > Your best bet would be to use as many representation attributes as are > necessary. In general I would use both a representation clause and > pragma pack No, that's pointless, if you use a complete rep clause, then it is redundant to use pragma Pack since it won't have any effect.