From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,13b7917466f2d19 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-12 19:07:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.0 Date: 12 Oct 2001 19:07:09 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0110121807.761f3697@posting.google.com> References: <9a575af3.0110020747.2304ce86@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0110060639.31567261@posting.google.com> <9pr6e8$aai1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <%biw7.8780$H81.3054034106@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com> <5ee5b646.0110092223.72a80d0a@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1002938829 32448 127.0.0.1 (13 Oct 2001 02:07:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Oct 2001 02:07:09 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14442 Date: 2001-10-13T02:07:09+00:00 List-Id: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) wrote in message news:... > Of course. Still ... I did not cross a problem in the > last few days. Good to hear, and not so surprising, we did not move the sources to gnu.org till they were in reasonably good shape. I am just cautioning that they are still not passing all our QA tests, so there are definitely known problems (or rather known test cases that fail -- the related problems are not yet understood, that's what we are working on now). The commercial release of GNAT Professional based on gcc 3.x will not take place till we have solved the remaining problems. And indeed the current checked in version at gnu.org does not yet meet our criteria for a public release either. But it is in fairly good shape, and certainly good enough shape to work on build and test issues, and to be suitable for experimentation. Robert Dewar