From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,13b7917466f2d19
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-09 15:31:20 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.0
Date: 9 Oct 2001 15:31:19 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0110091431.1496b922@posting.google.com>
References: <mailman.1002644234.11288.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1002666680 24909 127.0.0.1 (9 Oct 2001 22:31:20
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Oct 2001 22:31:20 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14102
Date: 2001-10-09T22:31:20+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Steven Deller" <deller@smsail.com> wrote in message news:<mailman.1002644234.11288.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>...
> Ted,
> Hmmm.  I read the relevant passages you quote and see nothing that prevents
> *compiled binaries* from being restricted in their distribution.  Yes, the
> sources have to be pointed to, but not the binaries.
> 
> What did I miss?

Well I can't tell what you missed, but indeed the GPL
prevents placing any restrictions on redistribution. If
you are unclear about the GPL, I suggest looking through
the GPL FAQ.