From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5867ff5404195f0e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-09 10:30:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: FYI: GNAT and GCC Date: 9 Oct 2001 10:30:19 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0110090930.5274699a@posting.google.com> References: <3BBA9724.2020009@earthlink.net> <5ee5b646.0110030812.d2ad098@posting.google.com> <3BBBCF3B.9050403@earthlink.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1002648619 19363 127.0.0.1 (9 Oct 2001 17:30:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Oct 2001 17:30:19 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14062 Date: 2001-10-09T17:30:19+00:00 List-Id: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) wrote in message news:... > > 1 Following Errors are new to me: > > - pragma Inline in package specification do not longer work for code in > package bodies, but can not reproduce this in a very short example. > > - Instantiation of a generic with a derivated type now cleanly rejects > nonderivated integral types. Good to hear that you got a clean build. Remember to report any problems to report@gnat.com (you can also use the standard gcc process), but errors reported to CLA go into the ether :-)