From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5867ff5404195f0e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-04 04:38:45 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: FYI: GNAT and GCC Date: 4 Oct 2001 04:38:44 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0110040338.4ebe6529@posting.google.com> References: <3BBA9724.2020009@earthlink.net> <5ee5b646.0110030812.d2ad098@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1002195525 19717 127.0.0.1 (4 Oct 2001 11:38:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Oct 2001 11:38:45 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13713 Date: 2001-10-04T11:38:45+00:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol wrote in message news:... > No, but it will probably be easier to install as it is just to add the > gcc-gnat DEB, RPM, SLP etc. package to the installation. Yes, although of course unlike the other gcc front ends, to install from sources requires that you go and fetch at least a gnat1 starter executable from somewhere. That's not significantly less work than installing a complete GNAT in the first place. I just don't want people to get the wrong impression here. I think a fair analogy is the extent to which chill got picked up as part of typical gcc installs. Robert Dewar