From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5867ff5404195f0e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-02 21:04:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: FYI: GNAT and GCC Date: 2 Oct 2001 21:04:18 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0110022004.5543b3e0@posting.google.com> References: <5ee5b646.0110021022.2843da52@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1002081858 27204 127.0.0.1 (3 Oct 2001 04:04:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Oct 2001 04:04:18 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13661 Date: 2001-10-03T04:04:18+00:00 List-Id: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote in message news:<5ee5b646.0110021022.2843da52@posting.google.com>... > The GNAT sources are now at gcc. We are currently checking > to see that everything is there and is exactly as it should > be. For those who want to access these sources, I would > suggest waiting till tomorrow, to make sure everything is > settled down, we know for sure of one or two glitches that > need fixing. I should note that this version is very much an experimental one, suitable only for experimental use. It is known to have deficiencies with respect to our main test suite, so it is by no means as reliable as the 2.8.x official GNAT release yet. > Robert Dewar > (with his hat on as FSF maintainer for GNAT)