From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,91540088e4856cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-02 11:24:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Quality checking of code Date: 2 Oct 2001 11:24:40 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0110021024.74e392ef@posting.google.com> References: <9p5cp3014ut@drn.newsguy.com> <6nvt7.55822$QK.36784758@news1.sttln1.wa.home.com> <9p6a5n02tgp@drn.newsguy.com> <5ee5b646.0109300617.61bf58e0@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0110010616.5b332f1a@posting.google.com> <2cdu7.32$3e4.3829@read2.inet.fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1002047081 18737 127.0.0.1 (2 Oct 2001 18:24:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Oct 2001 18:24:41 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13637 Date: 2001-10-02T18:24:41+00:00 List-Id: Florian Weimer wrote in message news:... > Of course, the proper way to check the syntax of HTML documents is to > use a SGML validator. Although some editors contain with fairly > complete SGML parsers, special tools do a much better job. (The > syntactic requirements of SGML-based HTML are quite complex.) Of course, as I understand it, there was no syntax error in our page, just a poor choice of colors (white on white) that for some reason was mishandled (in a user friendly manner) by both IE (all versions) and older versions of Netscape :-)