From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c62a5e526aafd9d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-21 21:12:27 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Windows CE? Date: 21 Sep 2001 21:12:27 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0109212012.8e7b006@posting.google.com> References: <3ba873c7.9907836@news.demon.co.uk> <5ee5b646.0109200656.62a7bb3e@posting.google.com> <3bab04cd.4954954@news.demon.co.uk> <3bab55b6.25668108@news.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1001131947 27983 127.0.0.1 (22 Sep 2001 04:12:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Sep 2001 04:12:27 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13244 Date: 2001-09-22T04:12:27+00:00 List-Id: john.mccabe@emrad.com.nospam (John McCabe) wrote in message news:<3bab55b6.25668108@news.demon.co.uk>... > Having read a number of Robert's postings before on > currently unavailable GNAT versions, I read it as > "contact the sales office and we'll see if we can > negotiate some way of making it available at your > expense". You read it wrong, Stephen's analysis was quite correct, (thankyou Stephen). As Stephen said, we pay no attention to this kind of post on CLA in terms of our sales planning because we have no way of distinguishing serious potential customers from hobbyists in this environment. So, let me say once again, if you are seriously interested in a supported version of GNAT Professional for a target you do not see us list, contact our sales office. In some cases you may be expressing an interest in a target for which we are already planning a port (there are several such targets at the moment). In other cases, your interest may be the straw that tips the scales of decision for us to start another port. In other cases, sure, it may be that someone wants a port that so far no one else has pushed for, and is willing to pay some or all the costs (several GNAT ports have initially appeared that way). It all depends, and to understand which if any of these cases apply, you need to talk to us (and to other Ada vendors who may have different sets of plans when it comes to supported target. Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies