From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dd6622a305422ade X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-09 08:53:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Suggestion for Ada 0X - "Complete" Record Rep Clauses Date: 9 Sep 2001 08:53:28 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0109090753.20cde68@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1000050809 26952 127.0.0.1 (9 Sep 2001 15:53:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Sep 2001 15:53:29 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12948 Date: 2001-09-09T15:53:29+00:00 List-Id: "Chris Miller" wrote in message news:... > Here is a quick suggestion for Ada 0X. I have no idea if it has been > suggested before. Probably you should submit suggestions following the standard procedure as comments on the standard, A quick comment is that it is always good to check that the compiler has layed out data structures as you expect if it is critical. The -gnatR switch in GNAT is useful for this purpose.