From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f031433924c1a0a3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-24 10:01:42 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: String manupulation (again) - free software
Date: 24 Aug 2001 10:01:42 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0108240901.21ee00b4@posting.google.com>
References: <9m2sf3$8ru$1@snipp.uninett.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 998672502 4587 127.0.0.1 (24 Aug 2001 17:01:42
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Aug 2001 17:01:42 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12388
Date: 2001-08-24T17:01:42+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Reinert Korsnes <Reinert.Korsnes@ffi.no> wrote in message news:<9m2sf3$8ru$1@snipp.uninett.no>...

> Below is also a test program for this package.
> (package spec not included).

The above comment seems to indicate that you do not understand the
critical importance of the package spec. In fact for a package like
this, the properly commented spec is far more important than the
(essentially straightforward, if not trivial) implementation. It is
the spec that embodies the real work, which is the interface design.