From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c397a9e135b263db
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-03 12:25:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What happens to DEC Ada?
Date: 3 Aug 2001 12:25:01 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0108031125.788f9e42@posting.google.com>
References: <9ff447f2.0107310659.36d01e9@posting.google.com>
 <%jra7.3545$257.153834@ozemail.com.au>
 <NKj7nYr7sQCg@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <yYva7.18321$GC4.4165649@nnrp1.proxad.net>
 <jGvPbYAYRtuu@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <nwya7.18388$MB7.4309099@nnrp1.proxad.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.244
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 996866701 6749 127.0.0.1 (3 Aug 2001 19:25:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Aug 2001 19:25:01 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11253
Date: 2001-08-03T19:25:01+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"nicolas" <n.brunot@cadwin.com> wrote in message news:<nwya7.18388$MB7.4309099@nnrp1.proxad.net>...

> > > The problem occurs when several files in different directories have same
> > > name, same timestamp, and are selected with ADA_INCLUDE_PATH
> > > timestamp and name of the file is checked, they are the sames, gnatmake
> > > doesn't figure out that this is a different file and doesn't recompile
>  it.

Actually this is a bad description, and Nicolas, perhaps working with
an old version of gnatmake is not correctly describing what happens.
Gnatmake also has the capability of checking logical checksums of
files, and the situation that Nicolas reports can be properly handled.
This is certainly not a problem we have seen from any of our customers,
and a quick test does not show a problem here. 

P.S. the logical checksum facility is what enables the smart
recompilation ....