From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,599b13f801b0f9eb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-26 03:38:25 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C++ virtual function mechanism in Ada ?
Date: 26 Jul 2001 03:38:25 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0107260238.26852f5b@posting.google.com>
References: <IDz77.6315$ar1.18443@www.newsranger.com>
 <eO4BFW3WWD3M@eisner.encompasserve.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.224.77.203
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 996143905 9625 127.0.0.1 (26 Jul 2001 10:38:25
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-support@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Jul 2001 10:38:25 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10587
Date: 2001-07-26T10:38:25+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) wrote in message news:<eO4BFW3WWD3M@eisner.encompasserve.org>...

> I think that is a very bad assumption in an Ada newsgroup.

That seems an entirely unreasonable reaction. Many well informed Ada
programmers will be aware of how major programming languages
handle things, and there are plenty of CLA readers who of course
know how C++ works. I definitely do NOT want to see elementary
tutorials on C++ appearing here! If you don't know C++ you should
probably just skip a thread with a subject like the above!