From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbcd0557f06cdbfa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-15 18:56:59 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Only one compilation unit. Date: 15 Jul 2001 18:56:58 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0107151756.2858bf55@posting.google.com> References: <3B497F21.8CD784D8@brighton.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.224.77.203 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 995248619 12804 127.0.0.1 (16 Jul 2001 01:56:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-support@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Jul 2001 01:56:59 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9980 Date: 2001-07-16T01:56:59+00:00 List-Id: Simon Wright wrote in message news:... > We had fun when the source was called Foo.ads, under NT one of the > split files ended up also called Foo.ads -- which overwrote our > original. gnatchop will never overwrite a file unless you spefically ask it to using the overwrite switch, in which case you can hardly complain :-) > Also, GNAT does *not* like files with upper-case letters in > the name at all! There are no such restrictions in GNAT. Check the section in the users guide on file naming, if you are having trouble, you are not following the rules in this section!