From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9c3a1871d2161925 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-05 14:46:50 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C/Ada performance comparison Date: 5 Jul 2001 14:46:49 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0107051346.117084a8@posting.google.com> References: <3B3C8E6A.39361C75@labe.felk.cvut.cz> <3B424298.9A7849CF@boeing.com> <3B4351F9.D901BEEC@ACM.org> <3B44135F.90D9711A@ACM.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 994369609 24049 127.0.0.1 (5 Jul 2001 21:46:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-support@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Jul 2001 21:46:49 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9502 Date: 2001-07-05T21:46:49+00:00 List-Id: Colin Paul Gloster wrote in message news:<3B44135F.90D9711A@ACM.org>... > I did say that > an equivalent Ada83 program wherein the C and Ada83 versions > use dynamic memory can hog a lot more memory than the C > version. Then the Ada program is NOT equivalent, or else the compiler you are using is not equivalent, period.