From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aa0f5be20f540641
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-22 14:01:47 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
Date: 22 Jun 2001 14:01:47 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0106221301.510f09c3@posting.google.com>
References: <f03d3b89.0106180804.268682d9@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 993243707 4065 127.0.0.1 (22 Jun 2001 21:01:47
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-support@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Jun 2001 21:01:47 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9049
Date: 2001-06-22T21:01:47+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

hpk104@hotmail.com (Harris) wrote in message news:<f03d3b89.0106180804.268682d9@posting.google.com>...
> now that gcc 3.0 is released, I want to know if there are still plans
> to incorporate gnat into gcc's source tree for 3.1?  Anybody know how
> things stand as of now?

I would suggest that anyone interested in following this, follow the
appropriate gcc list. This thread has a lot of misinformation which
is too much trouble to correct. On the gcc list, you can find out what
the real situation is.