From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,736edc70f75135a2,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-29 19:32:30 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: Brian.Gaffney@myrealbox.com (Brian Gaffney)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Indirect Ada Reference in EETimes
Date: 29 May 2002 19:32:29 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5e9b8c34.0205291832.7e2f62ce@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.216.57.106
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1022725950 1362 127.0.0.1 (30 May 2002 02:32:30
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 May 2002 02:32:30 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24975
Date: 2002-05-30T02:32:30+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I was rather surprised today to see a mention of ACT in an article in
EETimes (it's an old issue, it takes mail a while to get to my desk,
if it ever gets there).  The article was titled "Wind River rolls out
safety-critical software".  It appears GNAT will be a part of this OS
product, but it doesn't give much detail.

   I also found the article on their website
(http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20020516S0051), but it appears that
it is not exactly as it appears in my printed copy.  It seems to be
missing the reference to ACT providing their GNAT Professional to this
system, and I think the web version contains two extra paragraphs at
the end.