From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4039d4e40ecde64c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: fjh@murlibobo.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson) Subject: Re: Ada to C translator Date: 1997/02/17 Message-ID: <5e8g1c$bue@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 219281566 References: <5d7h2e$q4l$1@news.nyu.edu> <5d90qq$ka7@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <5e7rd2$ve6$1@news.nyu.edu> Organization: Comp Sci, University of Melbourne Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-02-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes: >fjh@murlibobo.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson) writes: >>kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes: >>>That's true, but it's not a hard optimization to only handle variables >>>that are actually *used* in the inner subprogram in a special way (or to >>>special-case a one-element structure). If a variable is used in an >>>inner subprogram, it probably has to be in memory anyway. >> >>If it's so easy, how come gcc doesn't do it? ;-) > >It does. Oh, right you are. My apologies. -- Fergus Henderson | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.