From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7b5615402713dcbb
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.89.196 with SMTP id bq4mr2449323pab.26.1346079187526;
        Mon, 27 Aug 2012 07:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 a5ni17917pbv.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: kalvin.news@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada and Java/C++
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 07:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <5dcada0c-f069-4e9e-b69d-0ff10edbf871@googlegroups.com>
References: <8bfbf709-18ac-43cd-b037-ce47adde96c2@googlegroups.com>
 <al1n38tdd0tq6p1os6p6angt91mginhoup@invalid.netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.150.124.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1346079187 28505 127.0.0.1 (27 Aug 2012 14:53:07
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:53:07 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <al1n38tdd0tq6p1os6p6angt91mginhoup@invalid.netcom.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.150.124.2;
 posting-account=QrZwxQoAAAByl3YAWTpexAk3yBYyZMHn
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-08-27T07:53:07-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

maanantai, 27. elokuuta 2012 17.43.52 UTC+3 Dennis Lee Bieber kirjoitti:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:46:33 -0700 (PDT), kalvin.news@gmail.com
>=20
> declaimed the following in comp.lang.ada:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> 	{pulls out crucifix, wooden stake, and mallet}
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > The idea that came to my mind was that if Ada language is implemented i=
n syntax similar to Java and C++, this might attract more programmer to ada=
pt Ada. This would mean creating Jada (Java-Ada) an/or Cava (C-Ada) languag=
es, that look like Java/C++, but actually they are Ada. So, no matter what =
language programmer would use Ada/Jada/Cava, the result would be the same -=
 robust code which has all Ada's good features.
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > Any comments on this?
>=20
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
> 	What? A syntax that has optional blocking constructs leading to
>=20
> potential dangling else situations, arguments over the "proper" place to
>=20
> put {, } on the lines, etc.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> 	If I wanted that, I'd use C#...
>=20
>=20
>=20
> 	Ada /fixed/ the problems Pascal had with blocking. Why would one
>=20
> want to revert to a language that allows for such ambiguous and error
>=20
> prone coding styles.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
>=20
> 	Wulfraed                 Dennis Lee Bieber         AF6VN
>=20
>         wlfraed@ix.netcom.com    HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/

for example, in Jada/Cada the if-else-statement would require open { and cl=
osing }. Also Jada/Cada could introduce elif.