From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,19750641bd2d1664
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.224.207.66 with SMTP id fx2mr8267133qab.7.1356198026468;
        Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:40:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.98.42 with SMTP id ef10mr2506097qeb.15.1356198026414; Sat,
 22 Dec 2012 09:40:26 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 k2ni1825qap.0!nntp.google.com!ee4no1735461qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:40:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <kb4qo7$mmj$1@online.de>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2.230.82.82;
 posting-account=vICoKAoAAACvprQdoU1Fu4jhuX0G_mBQ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2.230.82.82
References: <d7903ed4-8245-4a2e-b242-1108ceb3061c@googlegroups.com>
 <kb48b9$ih9$2@dont-email.me> <kb4qo7$mmj$1@online.de>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5db7f9b3-0532-4292-8c68-0220828de2e2@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: QtAda for Qt 5.0?
From: alb348@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:40:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-12-22T09:40:26-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Saturday, December 22, 2012 6:30:47 PM UTC+1, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Brian Drummond wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > Leonid Dulman announced it on this group yesterday...
> 
> 
> 
> No. He announced Qt5Ada, not QtAda. They're different things.

What I actually meant with my question was Ada bindings for Qt, and Qt5Ada seems to provide that.
I don't understand, how is QtAda different from Qt5Ada? Or perhaps they are two different projects which aim to do the same thing?!? I don't get it.