From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 5b1e799cdb,3ef3e78eacf6f938
X-Google-Attributes: gid5b1e799cdb,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k6g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.modula3,comp.programming
Subject: Re: Alternatives to C: ObjectPascal, Eiffel, Ada or Modula-3?
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <5da65370-01d5-4e45-984a-bd042b3acc3f@k6g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
References: <h3sln0$rhm$2@news.eternal-september.org>
 <c3f14h.bln.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.75.149.23
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1248097365 13503 127.0.0.1 (20 Jul 2009 13:42:45
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:42:45 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k6g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.75.149.23;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.eiffel:328 comp.lang.ada:7174
 comp.lang.modula3:54 comp.programming:11889
Date: 2009-07-20T06:42:44-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 20 juil, 11:57, Jean-Pierre Rosen <ro...@adalog.fr> wrote:
> 1) More than complex, Ada is feature-rich,
And its feature are logically or mathematically justified, that's what
make them easy to understand when needed. Trying to use some of its
features when they are not needed, is perhaps more difficult. That's
another good reason for the =93 Pascal subset =94 approach. This will also
imply that a too much lecture oriented course may not be well suited.
In some way, perhaps the traditional university approach is not well
suited (not all time).