From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e429176c9adb07b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-18 08:29:00 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: 402450@cepsz.unizar.es (Jano) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Re; [OT] Best way to isolate a GUI? Date: 18 Feb 2003 08:29:00 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5d6fdb61.0302180829.216f882@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.58.47.42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1045585740 3082 127.0.0.1 (18 Feb 2003 16:29:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Feb 2003 16:29:00 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34200 Date: 2003-02-18T16:29:00+00:00 List-Id: Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote in message news:... > | -----Message d'origine----- > | De: Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com > ... > | IMHO, the design with AWS is not comparable to the one with a > | classical GUI > | : there is no big added value to separate AWS from the main > | program. The GUI > | is allready separated, it's your browser. > it's _for example_ your browser. Whereas you have a point, I had thought of that. The point of separating AWS from the main program is that 1) It really doesn't perform core functionality 2) I need not to develop a definite implementation of the GUI, web oriented. I have seen the SOAP module in AWS and I like that approach. Is nearly equal to my first idea, only that it's standardized. It leaves open any languaje for the GUI and it's completely isolated. Mmm, anyone using SOAP for similar purposes?