From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a3b1c6915ea1273
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.196.130 with SMTP id im2mr263717pbc.3.1326445659242;
        Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:07:39 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni176864pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!rt.uk.eu.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How many Ada compiler bugs are here?
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:07:19 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <5cm1d9xlavps$.1tjtc88r9ze21$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <01dd6341-9c3c-4dcb-90f8-6ac66c65eb66@z1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
 <jentdh$4sd$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <98adc34c-deed-4190-9e10-755cb886984f@n39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <r5zh8ht12meh$.wxldkm3c7893.dlg@40tude.net>
 <cb4706b1-0635-407f-9ed0-1e1d552ee279@n6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-01-13T10:07:19+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:47:35 -0800 (PST), AdaMagica wrote:

> On 13 Jan., 09:23, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:26:34 -0800 (PST), Adam Beneschan wrote:
>>> But then again, with extended returns, you don't need to cook up a
>>> value. �The code:
>>
>>> � � � � �-- �needed to please the compiler:
>>> � � � � �return (Ada.Finalization.Limited_Controlled
>>> � � � � � � � � � �with others => <>);
>>
>>> could be written more simply as
>>
>>> � � � � �return Dummy : T;
>>
>> Not when T requires initialization, i.e. publicly has boxed discriminants.

> Of course this is legal since it's in the scope of the full view (it's
> a definite type in the full view, an indefinite only in the partial
> view).

Only if you have that full view in the function body.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de