From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Subject: Re: OO, C++, and something much better!
Date: 1997/01/27
Message-ID: <5cio7f$brk$1@news.nyu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 212602044
references: <32E999AE.2F68@parcplace.com> <dewar.854327202@merv>
 <32edc09c.3000098@nntp.interaccess.com>
organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
newsgroups: 
 comp.object,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel
Date: 1997-01-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <32edc09c.3000098@nntp.interaccess.com> sames@interaccess.com (Samuel S. Shuster) writes:
>  Yeah, I can see it that "Many Of You" just say "It Compiles, Let's Ship It!"
>
>  The quality of the drugs you're taking is showing.

I've heard nobody claim that *testing* is a bad idea.  The claim, with
which I agree, is that *reliance* on testing is a bad idea.  There's a
very large difference between those claims.