From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c724b6870c226707
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Rosen.Adalog@wanadoo.fr (J-P. Rosen)
Subject: Re: French Messages (was: fr.comp.lang.ada,
 pour discuter en frangais...)
Date: 1997/01/27
Message-ID: <5chqnt$q7h@hetre.wanadoo.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 212495161
references: <32E72A2C.3F54@Rational.COM> <5ca6h1INN7el@maz4.sma.ch>
organization: Adalog
reply-to: Rosen.Adalog@wanadoo.fr
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-01-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


lga@sma.ch (Laurent Gasser) wrote:

>Moreover, the overall moderate traffic on comp.lang.ada do not justify 
>a splitting in many branches (compilers, tasks, ...) and even less in
>many (human) languages.  We need concentration of forces at the moment,
>no diversification.
There was a poll for the creation of fr.comp.lang.ada, that came out
with an overwhelming "Yes". It means that there is a significant
amount of french speaking people who do think that it is useful.
And you could be surprised, as I am quite often, with the number of
professionnal programmers whose english is very poor...
Not to blame them. Just to tell that there IS room for a french
speaking Ada newsgroup

+------------------------------------o-------------------------------------+
|   J-P. Rosen                       |    Rosen.Adalog@wanadoo.fr          |
|   ADALOG - 27 avenue de Verdun     |    Tel: +33 1 46 45 51 12           |
|   92170 Vanves - FRANCE            |    Fax: +33 1 46 45 52 49           |
+------------------------------------o-------------------------------------+