From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
From: ell@access5.digex.net (Ell)
Subject: Re: OO, C++, and something much better!
Date: 1997/01/27
Message-ID: <5chbtn$s70@news3.digex.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 212454951
organization: The Universe
followup-to: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng
Date: 1997-01-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


TanselErsavas (tansel@rase.com) wrote:
: The biggest problem with Smalltalk is people, and
: organizations who insist in developing applications with an army of
: people who don't know much, rather than a few good people. 

This seems different from, how Alan Kay's view of how Smalltalk should be
used.  Especially for ubiquitous small applications.

Elliott