From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1111a3,5ee869da42505971
X-Google-Attributes: gid1111a3,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
From: embuck@palmer.cca.rockwell.com (Erik M. Buck)
Subject: Re: Combining dynamic and static typing
Date: 1997/01/24
Message-ID: <5c8u2j$jvo@castor.cca.rockwell.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 211884115
references: <32E6797A.6E21@parcplace.com> <E4G92y.1CD@syd.csa.com.au>
cc: donh@syd.csa.com.au
organization: Rockwell Avionics - Collins
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.objective-c,comp.object
Date: 1997-01-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In <E4G92y.1CD@syd.csa.com.au> Don Harrison wrote:
> Dynamic and static typing both seem to have their place. Devotees of the 
former
> extol the virtues of rapid development and devotees of the latter praise
> its greater reliability.
> 
> What I'm wondering is whether it would be useful to have a development 
> environment in which you had the option of using either. 

Objective-C enables either!