From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8d8e:: with SMTP id p136-v6mr13006096iod.32.1526950945107; Mon, 21 May 2018 18:02:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:604f:: with SMTP id v15-v6mr56552otj.11.1526950944251; Mon, 21 May 2018 18:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder4.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!87.79.20.102.MISMATCH!newsreader5.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!u74-v6no5145446itb.0!news-out.google.com!f20-v6ni5782itd.0!nntp.google.com!u74-v6no5145440itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 18:02:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=47.185.233.194; posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.233.194 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <5c2523c1-9ea5-453c-b80e-9cb0dcd16de0@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: DragonEgg has been revived From: "Dan'l Miller" Injection-Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 01:02:25 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Bytes: 1958 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1172625196 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52563 Date: 2018-05-21T18:02:24-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 4:37:13 PM UTC-5, Simon Clubley wrote: > [I apologise if this has already been covered in the walls of text > which have been flying around recently, but I have not seen this > mentioned yet.] > > I've just discovered that DragonEgg has been revived for GCC 8.x > and LLVM 6.x, although there is nothing in the announcement about Ada: > > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-August/116705.html > > Simon. > > -- > Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP > Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world Simon, how fervently do you seek an LLVM-backended GNAT? Over on other threads in recent days, I have been commenting on a proposed alternative to DragonEgg.