From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,3dbe4f9b1c81e39e,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,3dbe4f9b1c81e39e,start X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,3dbe4f9b1c81e39e,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,3dbe4f9b1c81e39e,start X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,3dbe4f9b1c81e39e,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,3dbe4f9b1c81e39e,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public From: ell@access4.digex.net (Ell) Subject: Re: OO, C++, and something much better! Date: 1997/01/21 Message-ID: <5c1nst$l8o@news3.digex.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 211200816 organization: The Universe followup-to: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng Date: 1997-01-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen FOU.TD/DELAB (ohk@ultra.tfdt-o.nta.no) wrote: : Aren't you confusing thes issue of static vs. dynamic typing with the : issuse of having an interpreter for the language, including an : integrated development environment? But doesn't static mean 'compile time' and dynamic imply 'runtime'? If you never compile it is all dynamic. Right? :-^} [And all of this ignores strong vs. weak typing.] Elliott