From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ?
Date: 1997/01/15
Message-ID: <5bido9$f1g$1@news.nyu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 209961323
references: <5aadbr$ad8@masters0.InterNex.Net>
 <32D64433.41C6@wi.leidenuniv.nl> <dewar.852912391@merv>
organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng
Date: 1997-01-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.852912391@merv> dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
>Indeed the most efficient way to write assembly language might well be to
>use the machine insertions available in many compilers (including GCC
>and GNAT) that allow you to write register independent code, and then let
>the optimizer circuits of the compiler do register allocation and 
>instruction scheduling on the instructions you write.

This is actually not as straightforward as it might seem since there needs
to be a way of describing the scheduling attributes of the instructions
you write and such a mechanism would be tricky (GCC and GNAT don't
support it, for example).

However, some assemblers will do instruction scheduling.