From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,971aa11c293c3db1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-18 13:51:35 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: codesavvy@aol.com (codesavvy)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada The Best Language?
Date: 18 Jul 2001 13:51:34 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5be89e2f.0107181251.2a616bc4@posting.google.com>
References: <5be89e2f.0107170838.c71ad61@posting.google.com>
 <9j1uio$8br$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <5be89e2f.0107171810.1cee29c0@posting.google.com>
 <3B55C6B0.C2ED36@san.rr.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.59.170.85
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 995489495 2567 127.0.0.1 (18 Jul 2001 20:51:35
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-support@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Jul 2001 20:51:35 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10202
Date: 2001-07-18T20:51:35+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Darren New <dnew@san.rr.com> wrote in message news:<3B55C6B0.C2ED36@san.rr.com>...
> codesavvy wrote:
> > 
> > I don't care if you think I'm trolling, I'm not.  I think the answer
> > is rather obvious, Ada has nothing to offer that is substantially
> > better than what C++ offers.  
> 
> Does C++ offer built in and portable multitasking, protected objects,
> real-time performance, built-in portable interrupt interfacing,
> distributed programming?

No but do you have any data that measures how much more productive an
Ada developer is using these features?  BTW I like these features in
Ada 95 a lot.  I doubt, however, that producitivity is increased
significantly by having them available.