From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b02f5fed4171d18c
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Attribute denoting a subprogram : no named parameter associations
	allowed
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <5bc23b42-3a87-463b-b7c8-ab1b426c5191@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <26d15919-f609-4878-8960-61bc87913cca@p23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
	<hc7n14$6ik$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <7073f784-e47f-4eea-9738-8ecec7648798@r24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.66.190.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1256687241 29659 127.0.0.1 (27 Oct 2009 23:47:21
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:47:21 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.66.190.2;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8821
Date: 2009-10-27T16:47:21-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 27 oct, 23:36, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> None of this matters, in any case, except to pedants.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -- Adam

I'm aware this question in the context of attributes has something
anecdotal, but this is just I like to use named association as soon as
there is at least two parameters in a call. So it happens a moment I
asked to my self =93 why isn't it possible with attributes =94 ?

About the weight of this matter, this is anecdotal, that's true
(pedant is a lot said, think this is about named association, which
are useful).