From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.36.190.143 with SMTP id i137mr1591791itf.43.1508511043445; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:50:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.41.135 with SMTP id n7mr214551otb.5.1508511043381; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!k70no2597718itk.0!news-out.google.com!p6ni645itp.0!nntp.google.com!l196no2591465itl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.167.212.145; posting-account=bPTmZAoAAAC_6HP9XLKB9aAAxBa6BuOR NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.167.212.145 User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <5b65b9f0-25d9-449a-b7eb-d1fc112f293f@googlegroups.com> Subject: About good practice: Should protected objects be small? From: reinert Injection-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:50:43 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Bytes: 1181 X-Received-Body-CRC: 424339262 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48531 Date: 2017-10-20T07:50:43-07:00 List-Id: I am testing out using protected objects. Is it reasonable good practice to keep protected objects small? It seems like for me (?) and stubs ("is separate") is not allowed there. reinert