From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a5e:d50e:: with SMTP id e14mr1150677iom.224.1559154166532; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:22:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2094:: with SMTP id y20mr81244386otq.340.1559154166360; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!i64no85253iti.0!news-out.google.com!p73ni36itp.0!nntp.google.com!4no51006itm.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 11:22:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53aecf06-e2f0-48f5-a9f1-1902b6092eb5@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.6.150.53; posting-account=EJa43AoAAADqsw8wi0Dr1nlSnlaxkSMa NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.6.150.53 References: <3647d776-3024-4b74-9e7e-0798e9b55079@googlegroups.com> <13c2b751-4e0e-4fc7-8a4c-010c86693284@googlegroups.com> <53aecf06-e2f0-48f5-a9f1-1902b6092eb5@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <5b62a64e-4e81-42af-accd-a6bef0aa96cf@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: can ada do this? From: Rabican Injection-Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 18:22:46 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56401 Date: 2019-05-29T11:22:45-07:00 List-Id: On Friday, May 17, 2019 at 1:40:00 AM UTC-4, Maciej Sobczak wrote: > > 1 can you talk to scylla from ada? >=20 > Most likely the easiest path is to bind to the C client API, if the pure-= Ada API does not exist. >=20 > > 2 could u replace scyla with somethign better coded in ada? >=20 > What do you mean by "better coded"? Is this product badly coded, currentl= y? Or, if you think that the product would benefit from better coding (pres= umably in the context of some bug, which is a local problem), would it be p= ossible to code it better in the existing language (presumably by fixing th= e local bug)? >=20 > And, lastly, why would anybody replace an existing (and apparently very g= ood) product with another one? It's much better to spend your effort creati= ng something new instead. >=20 > --=20 > Maciej Sobczak * http://www.inspirel.com Thank you and others for nice thoughtful answers.