From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,254e274bb44efd72 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tigr@best.com (Russel A. Hill) Subject: Re: Ada Compiler for Embedded x86 Date: 1997/01/10 Message-ID: <5b4bnr$dlf@nntp1.best.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 208922021 references: <5b1svu$1gg@nntp1.best.com> <5b1t6m$1gg@nntp1.best.com> <5b40ms$mg0@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu> content-type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII organization: Virtual Genetic Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-01-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: I am familiar with DDC-I. I'm looking for a different vendor. In article <5b40ms$mg0@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu>, WhiteR@CRPL.Cedar-Rapids.lib.IA.US says... > >In article <5b1t6m$1gg@nntp1.best.com>, tigr@best.com says... >> >>I forgot. The prferred host is VAX/VMS (also legacy). >> >> >>In article <5b1svu$1gg@nntp1.best.com>, tigr@best.com says... >>> >>>DOes anyone have any recommendations for a Ada-83 Compiler targeting an >>>Embedded 80186? >>> >>>I am beginning a rather large project which is using a legacy compiler with >>>HUNDREDS of known bugs. I need something which can produce correct ROMable >>>code. > > Try DDC-I. It is a not well kept secret that a lot of avionics equipment >have been using it with x86 processors for the past 10 years. > >_______________________________________________________________________ >Robert S. White -- an embedded sys software engineer >WhiteR@CRPL.Cedar-Rapids.lib.IA.US --long/cheap alternate I-net address >