From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,334f9012742e58fc
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Gautier write-only <gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Gnat GPL 2010 available soon (conditional expressions)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <5b469d9a-49b1-4859-87bc-66202adc3d48@i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: <2010061621145016807-sjs@essexacuk>
 <op.veihbktxnfgb3u@richard.piraten.dd>
	<0fa4c574-9539-492f-8514-d32c68beb22a@w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
	<1frrgtpa5dycl$.12kl72iqsg3dx$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4c270613$0$6974$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
	<1wuwvzgwlwgli$.1birkinieia0d$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <f1a86f31-598c-4cb1-a60e-011da55f5feb@x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
	<1ur19ais2ejih.mjbgdsv9pr66.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4c275562$0$6987$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
	<4c276114$0$2378$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> <i0dhh3$qh7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.1.1.96
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1277870951 26347 127.0.0.1 (30 Jun 2010 04:09:11
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:09:11 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.1.1.96;
	posting-account=gRqrnQkAAAAC_02ynnhqGk1VRQlve6ZG
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.2
	(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.342.9 Safari/533.2,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12982
Date: 2010-06-29T21:09:11-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 29 juin, 21:28, "Randy Brukardt" <ra...@rrsoftware.com> wrote:

> P.S. But the resolution of conditional expressions is surprisingly
> complex. I think we've got it right, finally.

I can imagine - and probably it will be usual to come across code
like :

X( (if Condition_a then Expression_1a else Expression_2a) ):=
  Y( (if Condition_b then Expression_1b else Expression_2b) );

with Condition_b involving X and Condition_a involving Y, for
instance... mmmh!

G.