From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ad4585f2971e47c5 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news2.arglkargh.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.news-service.com!216.196.110.142.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:00:10 -0600 From: Brian Drummond Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Need some light on using Ada or not Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:02:58 +0000 Reply-To: brian@shapes.demon.co.uk Message-ID: <5b10m6ts00bu7shkou40j6pq0gg14tdrnn@4ax.com> References: <4d5ef836$0$23753$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <7ibvl6tn4os3njo3p4kek9kop44nke3n7t@4ax.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser X-Trace: sv3-KrlMl4V70RDhswn2hhQ7crGQMimxkAnkQwWJP5fXuv15k11jBfL0Bccx82vT/BKLWfO8XZKnebMIdOO!up1eMQc4cOQlLb0FRDC+jdtqcCTBuEi7x5FuxUQ4lLUMVxd8VwIwzujuUBGkhZlkLnpRBR06Gu7x!L4c= X-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 1820 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18426 Date: 2011-02-19T18:02:58+00:00 List-Id: On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:17:18 +0000, Simon Wright wrote: >Brian Drummond writes: > >> Another example : moving an array from local variable (the stack) to >> the heap (after I increased its size and hit a stack size limit) meant >> I had to refer to it through an access type, instead of >> directly. Instead of "my_array(I,J,K)" I was faced with changing every >> reference to "my_array_ptr.all(I,J,K)" ... > >Really? I think that "my_array_ptr(I,J,K)" would have worked .. I believe you are correct sir! Which is even simpler than the rename... - Brian