From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6c434e6fc0d3ab95 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jfarr@aloha.net (James Farr) Subject: Re: Why Ada for learning Data Structures (was: What good is Ada ???) Date: 1997/01/04 Message-ID: <5amins$nts@nuhou.aloha.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 207745377 references: <32cf95b5.9781483@netnews2.worldnet.att.net> <1997Jan4.140137.1@eisner> organization: Hawaii OnLine - Honolulu, HI newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-01-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <1997Jan4.140137.1@eisner>, kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) wrote: >In the end, however, the choice of Ada for this particular course >was made by wiser folk than you, since you have chosen their school >as a source to enhance your own knowledge. If that was a mistake, >then you need to transfer schools. As an Ada fan, however, I urge >to wait until the end of the quarter to judge how well you learned >Data Structures. > >Larry Kilgallen Wow, got kind of defensive there, didn't you! I mean, his question was simply, "Why learn Ada rather than Java?" I'm kind of interested in that myself. But you didn't answer the question; you just reacted to a perceived slight. This is the same kind of answer you get when you ask an Amiga user why you would buy a PC, or a Macintosh user....